Trump Tells Erdogan ‘I Will Destroy Turkeys Economy’ In Leaked White House Letter

Interestingly enough, Russia Today is now touting a leaked White House letter from the office of the Presidency, in which Donald Trump literally tells President Erdogan of Turkey “Dont be a fool” in regards to his current Syria invasion, with treats of “destroying Turkeys economy” if Erdogan and Trump can not reach a deal in the near future. Dated October 9th 2019, the letter is incredibly interesting for many reasons, first off is the fact it is completely immature and almost childish language coming the from nations highest office. Second, Trump is outright threatening a NATO ally with economic sanctions and economic Warfare – much like we have done to Russia, Venezuela, Iran and many others over recent years. This is also incredibly dangerous for not just the future of international relations between the US and Turkey, but all NATO countries for that matter.

Honestly, I am not going to hype up the letter any more or any less for you, instead you can read it for yourself below…..

Image may contain: text

Fact Checking The Democratic Debate on The Syria/Turkey Question

I’m not sure why it has me so fired up the last couple of days, but when I saw Joe Biden’s face on the television tonight being asked a question about President Erdogan’s new initiative in Syria and Donald Trumps decision to withdraw troops from the country I flicked off the TV and said “Fuck You. Fuck You. You know how many people died because of you?” Then I just kind of walked away for a second to calm down. When I walked back I proceeded to watch the rest of the debate surrounding Syria and I just shook my head the whole time.

I just couldn’t believe how perverted the Democrats logic was on this issue, which was easy to press forward given that there was no opposition to any of their points of view – so they all just piled on. So, for the purposes of this “article” I just want to fact check some of the so called information the international public was subjected to tonight.

What I think angered me most was the fact the nearly all the Democrats, with the exception of Tulsi Gabbard, essentially vowed to create a new permanent and more official War in Syria if they ever became President in 2020. But it’s almost as if they have no understanding why the USA “lost” the War in Syria in the first place? It was because Russia literally went all in to back/save Bashir al-Assad, for a number of reasons I am not going to talk about today. Meanwhile, the USA merely has 1,000 troops forced to operate under the rules of engagement, which esentially doesn’t allow them to fire a shot without permission. Russia on the other hand will blow anything and anyone up anytime, and they don’t give a f*ck about it either. Point being, for the USA to ever logistically “win” in Syria it would have had to dramatically stepped up military presence and directly taken on Russian forces already stationed on the ground there – id est the USA would literally have to go to War with Russia to win in Syria. Is that what the Democrats want? All out War with Russia? To bad there wasn’t anyone around to challenge their strong positions on this subject.

But that brings me to my second point. Why did Russia beat us to the punch in Syria? This was because of Joe Biden and Barack Obama’s decision to not invest more heavily in the country than we did, instead choosing to ship weapons and munitions to forces already on the ground in Syria, rather than have US forces do it directly for themselves. Such as was the case with arming the Kurds, whom were gifted more arms and munitions than you can shake a big stick at, which is now why Turkey has to target them militarily today, because the US armed them so heavily they became their own rogue militant threat in the region – which happens to border Turkey. Keeping up yet?

Point being, the decision to not invest in Syria more heavily, sooner, was Obama/Biden’s decision or indecision. Moreover, the decision to overthrow the the Assad regime in the first place was also made by Obama/Biden, and the decision to arm the Kurds so heavily was also made by Obama/Biden’s – leading to the crisis everyone is debating today. The Dems all said that Donals Trump has all the blood on his hands for what he did, but they need not look any further than the man man on stage with them, Joe Biden, whom has more blood on his hands than Doanld Trump could ever soak in – specifically in regards to talk to Syria. I guess if Biden is looking for the guilty, he need not look any further than a mirror.

Also, lets be real. There is a reason why Turkey “flipped” on the United States and why commentators now have to ask the question at the 2019 debate “does Turkey still belong in NATO?” The question is obviously yes, why do you think Donald Trump is doing what he is doing? To save NATO. Just think about it, if the US engages in Syria more heavily, specifically in regards to backing up the Kurds coming under assault, the US would literally be engaging with and against Turkey – a NATO member. So, it begs the question, if two NATO allies start bombing one another, what does that mean for Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty and which side would all the other NATO countries have to come in defense with? You see, stopping Erdogan in Syria now would mean two NATO countries going to War with one another, which would essentially spell the end of NATO entirely. By exiting Syria, Trump is avoiding a NATO breakup. In this sense, Trump is trying to save the NATO alliance for much bigger issues which may arise throughout the future – preserving its power structure. Does the Democrats want to break up NATO just to save the Middle Eastern Kurds? Is that really a deal they are willing to cut, also going to War with Turkey in the process? I think not, but just let them talk all loud and proud in front of a microphone for a night.

** EDITORS NOTE: Turkey flipped on the USA in 2016 to side with Russia because Russia showed Turkey some leaked cables in the weeks leading up the attempted coup of President Erdogan in July 2016, which was easily foiled by the President. As Turkey has now since also proven, not only did they see hacked materials from the US by their Russians counterparts meant to sway their opinions, but Turkey also produced evidence of their own that the CIA and Obama/Biden were behind the attempted coup – largely for many of the same fallacious notions you are hearing about the Syrian conflict in the Democrats debate today. Essentially, Obama/Biden and Israel wanted Erdogan out to get rid of Assad and create a new Kurdish state. As they say, the so called “Best laid plans of mice and men” – right? Or should it be, “how Biden/Obama f*cked up the Middle East and US relations for a decade?” There is a reason Turkey turned on the USA and Trump has nothing to do with it – it was all Obama/Biden **

I guess that’s all I really have to say here, I’m just being real about the situation. I have no ‘skin in the game,’ what do I have to gain from typing this out for you? I don’t support Trump and I am not a Democrat, but you better damn sure bet even I would give Donald Trump a high five for pulling out of Syria. Better to end it now and not to make it our next Afghanistan, or Iraq, or Vietnam, or Korea – etc.

As The Peoples Democratic Party Seized Control Over Ankara & Istanbul Today, Here’s A Look At How President Erdogan’s Authoritarian Approach To Law Enforcement Led To The APK’s Lose

Prior to today’s elections, March 31st 2019, last night I came across an interesting paste from a group of online activists going by the name of “AnonyKurds” (@Guerillojova), detailing the state of freedom of the press inside Turkey and the true extend to which President Erdogan has gone to restrict/censor negative publications against him and his ruling party; the Justice and Development Party (AKP). More specifically, the Tweet includes 100 examples of Twitter account owners whom have either been sued and/or imprisoned by the AKP party for posting controversial/slanderous publications, videos or commentary critical of President Erdogan and his ruling Party.

Full Press Release from AnonyKurds:
Backup Twitter List:

However, following tremendous victories from the Peoples Democratic Party (HDP) in Ankra and Istanbul, AnonyKurds went on to explain how over 30,000 Kurds alone have been arrested by President Erdogan all within the last 2 1/2 years dating back to the failed coup of July 2016 – a National crackdown which has seen the arrests of 160,000 collectively dating back to 2016. As they were also quick to elleude to, the HDP vitctories today can largely be attributed to these very efforts.

Full Press Release from AnonyKurds:

T. C. ISTANBUL ANATOLIA 7. SULH ALGERIA. Business. No: 2018/7576 D.İş

Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s deputy requesting. Ahmet inezel 24/12/2018 With the request of the remittance; in the publications mentioned in the wishes of the applicant’s personal rights are violated, the person’s honor and dignity of the expression of offense, according to Article 299 of the TCK’ has requested to prevent access to the links in the links by stating that the insult mevcut has been committed.


For the first time, it was understood that our court was competent as of the applicant’s place of residence. First of all our Constitution Article 17 (protection of the person’s material and spiritual existence), article: 25-26 expression rate- Article 28 and more (press release) and article: 32 (right of reply and dissemination), 5651 on Internet Regulation Law and bun 4 castells v Spain Emin decision of the Court dated 23/04/1992, the decision of the Court of First Instance of the Court of Constitutional Court of First Instance (application no. 2013/2602 and decision date 23/01/2014), The decision of the Supreme Court of Appeals of the Supreme Court of Appeals dated 11/07/2006 on 2006 / 4-162 basis and 2006/181 and 2012/4 – 511 basis and 2012/1280 decree no. 2012/5834 of the Court of Cassation.

In the first part of the press and the Internet media in this context, the public is informed about the issues of interest to the public, the lighting service, the information gathering, the dissemination of criticism, commenting on the use of the rights of the European Human Rights Article 10 of this amendment recognizes the right to use these rights, which are enshrined in accordance with Article 28 of the Constitution and Law no. 5651, as a justification for law, and to disseminate, criticize and interpret information.

The fact that the information in the description, criticism and value judgment is real and bright, that there is a public interest in the use of public interest and its usefulness, and there is a connection between the subject and the subject. and the use of non-disclosure flags, the exceptions of expressions and Internet broadcasting should be interpreted in a narrow and convincing manner, which is of interest to the public interest. and that an explanation of ideas is supported by an objective description of the press, where the press-internet publication can exaggerate to some extent and even appeal to provocation. It is necessary that the evaluations in polemic nature cannot be considered as false and personal attacks. When the Internet publications are examined: x